Editor:
Recently, some patients brought their son to see me for low back pain.
I was concerned by his emaciated appearance and noticed on the intake
form that he had cancer. Naturally I asked about treatment and was
informed he was receiving I.P.T (insulin potentiation treatment).
I asked about diet and he told me, “The Doctor didn’t
say anything about that.” I asked about I.V’s. Even a ‘Myers
cocktail.’ What about I.V. vitamin C.? No, nothing. O.K., so
it’s great that I.P.T, by dropping the blood sugar level way
down with insulin and then zapping the cancer cells with low dose
methotrexate or other chemotherapeutic drugs, works well in many
cases. However, it still belongs in the ‘medical mindset’ of
treating cancer, which is, “Kill the cancer cells.” But
what about the other half of the equation? Building Health. Everyone
who has any type of cancer has a disturbed immune system. Was he
taking any immune boosters? Oncolyn, thymic protein A, IP6, Beta
1,3-D Glucan, Lactoferrin, Mushroom combinations? No. Anything even
minimal such as high dose antioxidants? No. Nothing. Even though
he appeared to be dying of cachexia, he had never heard of Hydrazine
Sulphate, the amazing substance developed by Joseph Gold M.D, which
inhibits the loss of protein and body mass in cancer patients. It’s
available but like everything else that’s too good, it’s
officially banned by the F.D.A.
This is in no way a condemnation of I.P.T. Far from it. I have the
utmost respect for the brilliant Mexican Dr. Donato Perez Garcia who
developed I.P.T. and his grandson who carries on the treatment in his
Tijuana clinic, of course with no government interference.
Nevertheless, I wonder if practitioners understand that to give the
patient the best chance of survival, all aspects should be considered
in supporting the killing of cancer cells by I.P.T. Detox measures
such as coffee enemas are a basic. Likewise the restoration of health
could be considered a primary component. Diet, supplements and immune
support must be addressed. Whether one chooses to use the Gerson system,
Dr. Kelley’s approach or Dr. Manner’s or any other proven
system or combination or common denominator of such is up to the individual
practitioner.
There is somewhat of a misconception it seems in much of the Naturopathic
community, because of a so-called study done several years ago. A Naturopathic
physician visited cancer clinics in Mexico and followed patients for
several years. The ‘study’ showed that the five-year survival
rates weren’t that impressive. The problem was that almost all
the patients going to the Mexican clinics are medical failures to start
with and have all received chemotherapy, which greatly impairs the
immune system. Patients who are smart enough to figure out the system
and get legitimate treatment without chemo have a very high survival
rate. I know of no clinic or hospital in Mexico or anywhere else that
uses only one modality.
Even many ‘alternative’ doctors are misguided when it comes
to cancer treatment. In the recent Townsend
Letter focusing on cancer,
the Editor states: “When cancer does respond to treatment, invariably
it has been complicated requiring not only surgery, chemotherapy and/or
radiation, but usually numerous herbal and vitamin supports in addition
to some form of positive mental thinking.” Because of damage
done by chemo and radiation it’s difficult to understand any
logic to this statement but let’s assume this is just politically
correct rhetoric. The Editor also says, “We examine in this issue
and in one issue each year the progress in alternative cancer treatments.” It
would be wonderful to have real progress in alternative cancer treatments,
although rather than alternative, the term should be ‘legitimate.’ It’s
debatable whether we really need progress when all the wonderful treatments
we already have are ignored and legitimate cancer-inhibiting substances
are banned by the F.D.A. The letter from the National Cancer Institute
is really pathetic. Notice that plenty of their ‘studies’ are
combining CAM with conventional chemo and the rest of the proposed
studies are mostly stupid and irrelevant. If the NCCAM is really committed
to exploring legitimate approaches to treating cancer the first thing
they need to do is get another Government agency, the F.D.A., to lift
the ban on empirically proven cancer treatments such as Laetrile, Metbal
and useful immune boosters like staphage lysate. This will not happen.
It’s easy to read between the lines. It’s a sham, merely
a delaying tactic to try to appease. Their very heading, “NCCAM
Seeks Scientific Answers on CAM for Cancer” is absurd. The key
word here is supposed to be ‘scientific,’ and that usually
implies ‘double blind’ studies. Chemo is a proven ‘scientific’ treatment.
Proven to toxically poison several hundred thousand people to death
every year. Where are the chemo double-blind studies? Just like many
other drugs there are no double blind studies. What ridiculous hypocrisy!
According to a report from the Harvard School of Public Health it’s
calculated that 2 % to 3 % of those with cancer benefit from chemotherapy.
WARNING. The June 2004 issue of the Townsend
Letter contains a letter
from the National Cancer Institute. The writer is asking readers to
forward (turn in) names and contact information of Doctors actively
involved in treating cancer using ‘alternatives.’ Under
no circumstances should anyone offer any information before clearing
it with the individual practitioner. In many states Doctors treating
cancer by legitimate means, which is other than chemo or radiation,
can be subject to prosecution.
Even the use of CAM is misleading. Complementary and alternative medicine
suggests using ‘alternatives’ to complement mainstream
medicine. A better word is Integrative because a person’s health
should be restored using an eclectic approach—utilizing the best
for a particular manifestation from all branches of ‘Medicine’ including,
but not limited to, Naturopathy, Oriental Medicine, (the various methods
of acupuncture as well as Herbal formulas), Homeopathy in its various
forms, Chiropractic and or Osteopathic manipulation, Western Herbal
medicine, German Biological Medicine, Terrain Analysis, Natural Hormone
Replacement therapy, Diet, Vitamins, phytonutrients, minerals, Orthomolecular
medicine as defined by Linus Pauling and all other non-toxic modalities.
None of these modalities should be subject to any double-blind studies
as empirical evidence is all the proof ever needed.
Most of the population are brainwashed into believing ‘mass media
medicine.’ In his book, Answer Cancer:
Miraculous Healings explained
Stephen C. Parkhill states. “ If you want to identify the worst
abuses of hypnotic power, without a doubt the two situations where
abuse of hypnotic technique is causing the most illness or killing
huge numbers of people are the corporate-driven news, as it uses electronic
media to breed fear and emptiness, and the food and drug companies
using the same electronic media to make people feel emptiness, cravings
and symptoms of sickness. This is not how any viewers would consciously
choose to feel. But these feelings turn out to be the net result of
too much time viewing the medium.” He goes on. “ The thing
that makes me mad is that wrapped in this sheep’s costume of
harmless family entertainment, the real culprit of cultural decay doesn’t
even have to offer its wares for inspection at the critical faculties’ guard
shack. By recognizing the power of first impression, the consumer scientists
knew to go after infant minds more than a generation ago. The materially-burdened,
spiritually vacant images of their own self-serving America became
what all too many people received as their earliest impressions once
TV took hold. Consumer scientists learned to be there first when the
eggs cracked open, and now the little ducks think the fox is mommy.
By silencing all suspicion of power and intent, the real criminal slides
straight into the subconscious mind of the viewer unannounced and takes
powerful root. Quickly the critical faculty grows to protect the images
installed by the consumer scientists. These are the same people who
have been shaping the images that tell our subconscious minds what
life should look like. Believe me when I tell you these people are
experts at bypassing the critical faculty.”
Another interesting book, Mass Control: Engineering
Human Consciousness by Jim Keith, in Chapter 1, opening paragraph, Keith says, “Agents
of the world’s elite have long been engaged in a war on the populace
of the earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, greed so pervasive
that it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in
recent times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed. It is
the philosophy of mass control that ultimately aims at dictating every
aspect of human life- even remolding man’s perception of reality
and himself.”
Several years ago Suzanne Somers developed breast cancer. Instead of
chemo she opted for some alternatives and compromised (I think) by
allowing radiation. Suzanne Somers knows more about health and building
health than most ‘alternative’ doctors. Also she is right
on the mark with diet and weight loss. She appeared on Larry King and
I felt bad for her because she really had to ‘back peddle’ when
it came to talking about her choice of therapy. Larry King again asked
her about her treatment and what it was and she told him Iscador, the
German anthroposophical treatment developed why Rudolph Steiner back
in the twenties. He asked her why she chose that and she said it was
because it was non-toxic and killed the cancer cells with no collateral
damage. Larry King then gave away his ignorance by asking something
like, “Well if it’s that good why don’t the oncologists
use it?” She gave a big part of the answer by saying Iscador
could not be patented. Actually, that is a major key to the whole problem.
Natural products, for the most part cannot be patented. The cancer
establishment does not want a cure for cancer unless it’s a patented,
very expensive one.
Why would they? With over half a million people employed in the industry,
billions of dollars of revenue coming in every year from several hundred
thousand people being chemo’d to death, (average cost of around
$200,000) what would be the incentive? Don’t be so naïve
to think anything noble. Won’t happen. That should be completely
obvious to any clear thinking person. If the cancer industry really
did want a “cure” then why would every viable treatment
be condemned? Just look at the history of the industry. Everything
from Harry Hoxsey’s herbal formula that has cured hundreds over
decades and still is at the Bio Medical center in Tijuana, to William
B. Coley’s toxins which have amazing ability to boost the immune
system. Royal Raymond Rife and his incredible microscope and frequency
machine, proven to cure cancer very quickly but just as quickly destroyed.
Max Gerson, a rather complicated but absolutely proven treatment now
under the direction of his very capable daughter Charlotte, in Tijuana.
Dr. William Donald Kelley, who cured himself of Pancreatic cancer about
three weeks before death and went on to cure many cancer patients with
his system, utilizing the ignored work of John Beard and developing
a system of Metabolic typing among other interesting modalities, before
he got tired of government harassment and quit. Dr. Harold Manner,
who was head of the biology department at Loyola University eventually
left and opened a clinic in Tijuana. He states in the introduction
of his book, The Death of Cancer “The administration of Loyola
University of Chicago also deserves our sincere gratitude. Although
they have been under continuous attack for allowing me to continue
my work, they have steadfastly upheld my academic freedom, the right
to conduct research and report my results.” They were under continuous
attack because no proof was wanted that Laetrile had any anti-cancer
properties at all. That was in 1978. Meanwhile in California Dr. John
A Richardson, who had treated several hundred people with Laetrile
and vitamin C with much success, was ridiculed and prosecuted as a
Quack, his license revoked and his career destroyed, all by 1977. Dr.
Manner did absolutely legitimate university research with laetrile
and proved this substance, especially when combined with certain vitamins,
a powerful anti-cancer agent. It was banned and labeled ‘quackery.’ When
Dr. Richardson was locked up, Dr. Douglas Brodie ran his practice for
him. It wasn’t long before the authorities were after him too.
After all, in the people’s state of California it was (is) illegal
to treat cancer any other way except surgery, radiation and chemo.
(Cut, burn, poison) Dr. Brodie moved to Nevada, where he practices
to this day and now approaching 80, could be considered the ‘father’ of
non-toxic US cancer treatment.
Dozens of patients have achieved ‘permanent remission’ from
Dr. Brodie’s treatments.
In 1989, a patient and friend of mine, Jim Lawler of Kasilov, Alaska,
was diagnosed with Leukemia. He was in rough shape with sores all over
his legs, canker sores in his mouth and subject to colds and infections.
He was also sleeping 18 hours a day. Oncologists said they could try
and treat him but it was probably hopeless as no one ever survived.
He heard about a Greek Doctor having great success with all types of
cancer. Jim immediately contacted Dr. Hariton Alivazatos and left for
Greece. He joined the line of about three to four hundred Americans,
every morning, waiting to see the Doctor or his staff. All the patients
were given a diet sheet and received daily injections. By the fifth
day the sores on Jim’s legs were gone. By the 14th he was able
to easily walk several miles around the Greek ruins and by the 21st
day was in full remission. So far this remission has lasted more than
twelve years! There were many other cures but also some failures, just
as there is in other legitimate cancer clinics because most trusting,
naive and ‘brainwashed’ Americans seek the services of
regular Oncologists. Only after they are told the situation is hopeless
and they are almost dead do they seek so-called alternatives. Of course
by this time most of their immune system is severely compromised by
the toxic chemo. Nevertheless, a good percentage survive. Those like
Jim who didn’t have any toxic therapy have a very high survival
rate. Dr. Alivazatos had such great success that survivors and supporters,
all very naive people, wanted him to come to the United States and
share his great cancer cure. Dr. Alivazatos, also apparently quite
naïve, came to the U.S. but quickly found that the ‘authorities’ wanted
to ‘steal’ his formula. He was right to be suspicious.
He returned to Greece a very disillusioned man. The chances of his
system being used with him getting credit had about as much chance
as an inventor who designed a carburetor that would allow a big V8
engine to get 75 miles to the gallon, ever getting to market. Zero.
International Biologics Hospital in Tijuana offers the treatment under
the direction of the very capable Roberto Tapia. M.D. with continued
success. Dr Alivazatos’ formula consists mostly of a few vitamins
and an amino acid. It was marketed in the U.S. under the name Metbal
or Cellbal. It contained no drugs or synthetic ingredients. If there
was nothing to it then why did it become illegal and join all the other
cancer inhibitors on the F.D.A.’s black list of supposedly “unproven” cancer
treatments? Simple answer: Like Laetrile and all other threats to the
Cancer Industry it worked too well and could not be allowed.
What about the empirically proven work of Drs. Virginia Livingston
Wheeler, Kurt Donsbach, Geronimo Rubio, Ernesto Contreras, Harold Manner,
Johanna Budwig, Gerhard Ohlenschlager, Heinrich Kremer, Franz Xavier
Mayr, Abram Hoffer, Robert Bradford, Hulda Clark, Hans Neiper, Emanuel
Revici, William B. Coley, Jesse Stoff, Hariton Alivazatos, Lawrence
Burton, Stanislaw Burzynski, Joseph Issels, Keith Brewer, Jimmie Keller
and others. For a fuller review of successful treatments see Definitive
Guide to Cancer by Burton Goldberg.
Several months ago I referred a ‘terminal’ lung cancer
patient to Dr. Rubio and Bill Frye’s American Metabolic Institute
in Tijuana. The patient is now in remission and leading a normal life.
Jimmie Keller was not a doctor but had suffered from Cancer and after
radical surgery failed, cured himself. He got remarkable remissions,
especially with breast cancer at his Tijuana clinic. He was illegally
kidnapped in Mexico and bought back to the U.S. for a typical ‘kangaroo
court’ trial. He was convicted and as far as I know he is still
locked up for the crime of curing cancer.
In 1984 Dr. Brewer took Nobel prize winner Otto Warburg’s work
and translated his theories into a practical treatment for cancer,
expanding Warburg’s thesis using cesium to alkalize. He got remarkable
results, treating 30 patients with various cancers. Results? All thirty
survived. Why wasn’t his work hailed as a cancer breakthrough?
Look what a disgusting time Dr. Burzynski has had and his treatment
is particularly successful with children’s brain tumors. All
over the country poor little kids are tortured and killed by the thousands
with chemo and radiation, every year. What a crime. Why can’t
people see what’s going on? Maybe people cannot understand the
depths that man can sink to, all for profit and greed. I really think
that’s the key. Most people are honest and really believe we
have a system that’s trying to do right. Even commentators like
Bill O’Reilly don’t get it and seem to have no clue to
the truth and he’s living in a state that has particularly nasty
medical regulators. U.S a free country? Sure. Mass media brain-washing
has done a really excellent job because even intelligent people like
King and O’Reilly don’t understand. Burton Goldberg, in
his book, Alternative Medicine: Definitive
guide to Cancer sums up
the situation well. Talking about alternative treatments, he says “Many
powerful economic forces—pharmaceutical drug companies, physicians’ trade
groups, insurance companies, the Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.)
and the National Institutes of Health (N.I.H.), the latter two being
taxpayer-funded organizations within the U.S. government, want health
care to stay exactly the way it is because they’re thriving under
it. Successful alternative approaches to cancer are a direct financial
threat to this system. They are also a serious intellectual threat
to the belief systems of conventional medicine. If nutrition and the
immune system are so crucial to health and healing and they have never
addressed either, this means conventional doctors will have to “go
back to school” to catch up.
It’s not just the treatment of cancer that could be considered
criminally inadequate; it’s the treatment of all degenerative
disease, including the number one killer, heart disease.
There are cures for almost every condition and disease. These cures
are suppressed. Almost every disease or malady has a business built
around it and these businesses actively suppress any solution that
would destroy their income base. Drugs cannot cure. They suppress symptoms.
All drugs have secondary effects, some life-threatening themselves.
Iatrogenic disease is now considered the number 3 killer. There is
no health care system in the U.S. It’s a farce. It has nothing
to do with health.
The mainstream position on diet is wrong and is the main cause of illness
and obesity. Recent studies have shown that saturated fat and dietary
cholesterol do not necessarily raise serum cholesterol and serum cholesterol
has little if anything to do with heart disease. Partially hydrogenated
and hydrogenated fats, cis trans fatty acids, all sugars, processed
grains and processed foods in excess are the problem. Dr. Robert Atkins
was always right about carbohydrates and this will be totally proven
over time. The Atkins diet is not a high protein, high fat diet. It
is a low carbohydrate diet. That is, low intake of starches and ‘high
glycemic’ foods.
The U.S.Medical system has probably the finest emergency medical care
in the world and also amazing technologies to diagnose disease but
should be considered criminally negligent when it comes to treating
degenerative disease.
The drug pharmaceutical companies control Medicine and direct research.
There is no open research. If researchers go ‘off the path’ of
researching pharmaceuticals, they are fired and blackballed. The F.D.A.
is bought and paid for by the Drug pharmaceutical companies. (See lef.com.)
The only time the system will change is when it’s forced to because
people no longer seek the services of Medical Practitioners with no
answers except drugs which only suppress symptoms, while no attempt
is made to treat the cause(s). No one can ever be drugged or poisoned
back to health.
Dr. Curt Maxwell
P.O. Box 1075
Winterhaven, California 92283 USA
drmaxwell@pocketmail.com
|