Page 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
The story of this revolutionary episode in medicine
grows more interesting and more dramatic day by day. The suffering
patients in the country districts,
far from the well equipped clinics and hospitals, have at last found that
something can be done for them. Whether or not it meets with general
approval interests
them not at all. They ask for relief -- and they get it, where the applicability
of the measure to their complaint is obvious.
It would be unwise and unfair to both the medical profession and the public
to discuss the merits of hydrochloric acid therapy and fail to call attention
to its limitations and the actual dangers attending its use in certain
cases. We have called attention to the fact that the use of the acid intravenously
was followed by a considerable increase in the leukocyte count. A patient
who
had been suffering from myelognous leukemia, with a leukocyte count of
84,000 (the normal count being 6,500) was inadvertently given several intravenous
injections of this preparation, with the result that the already high count
rose to the unbelievable figure of over 400,000. Obviously, it is poor
medical
judgment to give a remedy that can only aggravate an existing condition.
Another important – vitally important – consideration affecting
the administration of hydrochloric acid is one that depends upon accurate and
painstaking investigation of the individual by the practitioner. Since this
measure had the effect of stimulating the defense mechanisms of the blood,
it is plain that the sudden increase of "phagocytes" at the focus
of infection will be followed by the formation of pus, which, after all,
is but an effort on the part of nature to attack invading bacteria. Should
this
sudden increase of the defense forces take place in an area where the drainage
is poor, an abscess may result. For instance, a patient may have a diseased
appendix that has been quiescent. A balance has developed in that patient
between the defense elements and the infecting organisms. A sudden marshaling
of the
phagocytes at this point may stir the sleeping dogs into a first-class
battle, with the result that the patient will require immediate operation.
Similar
situations may develop in other parts of the body, particularly in closed
spaces such as the middle ear and sinuses, and the patient must be watched
closely
for the development of acute symptoms that might require surgical treatment.
From a prognostic standpoint, the inability of the patient to respond to
stimulation is of grave significance. This is readily determined by the
blood counts made
at frequent intervals during a course of treatment. In fact, it is highly
essential that the progress of every case be watched by an intelligent
and observant
physician. While astonishingly good results have been obtained by hit-or-miss
methods in country districts by physicians who are without laboratory facilities,
it is reasonable to assume that more care is mandatory on the part of those
whose facilities are greater. The fact that there have been no reported
cases of death as the immediate result of this medication speaks volumes
for the
safety of this measure.
It may be well to discuss in simplest terms the essential differences between
the methods of hydrochloric acid medication used respectively by Ferguson
and Guy. There is little to add to what we have said in the preceding paragraphs
regarding Ferguson's technique and the principles upon which his reasoning
has been based. He is essentially a man of practical, rather than theoretical,
ideas. He proved to his own satisfaction that intravenous injections of
dilute hydrochloric acid was a practical and cheap germicide, of greater
potency
and
less destructive action than anything thus far discovered. Why, how, when,
and where its action occurred were of less importance than the fact that
the patient got well. Dr. Guy was more scientifically minded. Although
also a general
practitioner, he was determined to discover, if possible, a basis for the
formation of a theory. He was a student of biologic chemistry and, from
his knowledge
and observation of plant life and its behavior under the influence of hydrochloric
acid and the salts of potassium in the soil, he believed that certain similar
principles applied to the growth and nourishment of human beings. Most
importantly, he based his hypotheses on the observations of Hawk that lymph
circulation,
the medium by which nourishment is carried to every cell in the body, is
as greatly important as the blood, and any condition, whether chemical
or physical,
that interferes with the flow of lymph produces a profound effect on the
cells of every organ in the body. He had reduced his theory to simple and
easily
understood terms by a full explanation of the significance of the acid
balance of the human body and the necessity for a proper maintenance of
this balance
for health preservation. Under normal conditions, the hydrogen-ion concentration
of human lymph should be slightly on the alkaline side. Should this reaction
vary too much, either on the acid or alkaline side, the patient, will develop
conditions known respectively as "acidosis" or "alkalosis," either
of which may be fatal. In health, the acid balance is maintained by the normal
production of hydrochloric acid in certain cells of the stomach. Should this
production fall short of bodily necessity, the balance must be made up. Other
acids, which are the products of decomposition in the human body, such as lactic
acid, fatty acids, carbonic acid, uric acid and others, are called in to fill
the deficiency. These, however, are abnormal constituents of the great chemical
laboratory of the human body and are ill-adapted to the requirements, for they
are unable to keep in solution many of the salts which must be thrown off as
waste matter in bodily excretions: sweat, expired air, urine, and feces. In
the body's effort to provide acid of some sort, these harmful acids become
a "monkey-wrench in the machinery," and the condition known as "acidosis" results
with symptoms of general systemic poisoning. Conversely, when the hydrogen-ion
concentration of human lymph falls into the acid side, due to excess production
of lactic acid, fatty acids, carbonic acid, uric acid, and like poisons, the
body makes an effort to neutralize these with alkaline salts, such as calcium,
sodium, potassium, ammonium, and others. These also, being foreign to bodily
economy, produce the condition known as "alkalosis," the general
symptoms of which are similar to acidosis, but often attended with general
collapse.
Dr. Guy has claimed that the mere administration of hydrochloric acid to
a patient would not fulfill the necessary requirements. In his opinion,
potassium salts, often lacking in the patient's food, are a necessary adjunct
in the
treatment aimed at bringing about a normal acid-base balance. Excess of
potassium may be harmful, and the ingredients of the formula which he advocates
are
the
result of close clinical observation by himself and others. The case reports
following this line of treatment have demonstrated improvements and recoveries
that, in many instances, would seem miraculous, if it were not for the
basis of sound reasoning along the biochemical lines upon which the treatment
was
founded. Furthermore, if these reports were offered by the protagonist
of such a system of therapeutics himself alone, skepticism would be justified.
The
fact remains, however, that infinite numbers of similar reports from men
in active practice -- shrewd and experiences physicians on "the battle lines
of medicine" – have come from all parts of the world. Actual and
prompt clinical results to such men mean bread and butter. Satisfied patients
mean an increase in clientele. These men are willing to leave research to the
workers in heavily endowed laboratories. Their patients are more interested
in being cured than in scientific aspects of the disease from which they are
suffering. These patients ask them to "do something"; and the doctors
know that unless something is "done," their patients will drift
into the hands of some charlatan, who will at least give evidence of some
definite
form of active treatment, even though hopelessly misdirected.
The application of the principles of the hydrochloric acid therapy, or
the "acid-mineral
therapy" to various metabolic disturbances, such as diabetes mellitus,
arthritis, and many obscure conditions, is deserving of serious consideration.
The most elementary lessons in chemistry in our public schools, teach that
various substances may be held in solutions of given degrees of acidity
or alkalinity. When the ingredient proportions are perfectly balanced,
the solution
may be as clear and colorless as water; but let the acidity or alkalinity
change a minute fraction of a degree, and a turbid fluid will result, with
the accumulation
of a precipitate at the bottom of the container. With this explanation,
it is not difficult to understand how the normally clear and colorless
lymph
of the human body might, by a change in its chemical reaction, begin to
become cloudy and deposit the salts, such as calcium, which should be held
in solution.
The deposit of these salts in joints must naturally interfere with the
free and well-lubricated action of these joints. Could not such a change
in chemical
reactions explain the enormous deposits of lime salts in old arthritic
patients? Similarly, if the lymph should become turbid and sluggish, is
there not reason
to infer that the lymph channels would become blocked, and the normal amount
of nutrition be denied such structures as muscles, bones, cartilage, and
skin
-- in fact, every other component of the body? By the same line of reasoning,
is it not likely that the products of decomposition, which should be removed
by the lymph, would remain in the tissues and act as poisons to the delicate
individual cells? On this basis, can we not explain the atrophies of muscles
that are so characteristics of arthritis? With so many of the human body
cells becoming degenerated, is it not inevitable that the blood-making
cells should
also be affected? Anemia is a characteristic symptom of arthritis.
The applicability of Guy's theory to diabetes mellitus is still under
consideration. If it is true that by appropriate medication it is possible
to restore the acid-base balance of the blood or lymph, the possibility
of ultimate cure in these cases seems not unreasonable. Certainly, it seems
within the bounds of probability that the tendency to acidosis from the
absorption
of harmful metabolic products would be lessened; conversely, the tendency
for
the development of hypoglycemia and alkalosis from over-dosage with insulin
would be minimized. At best, insulin is only a crutch upon which the diabetic
patient leans heavily, and the medical profession is still seeking some
form of treatment that will correct the abnormal metabolic disturbances
that have
produced this distressing condition. We can see most clearly, however,
that it must be the interference with the circulation of the blood and
lymph in
the extremities that brings about diabetic gangrene. Even a slight improvement
in this circulation would provide much relief to the patient.
The most startling possibility in the development of the acid-base balance
theory -- one that we approach with the same feeling that one approaches
the spot where a treasure chest is said to be buried -- is that this theory
might
be the key to the vault in which lies the secret of cancer. Research foundations,
notably the department conducted at the University of Pennsylvania by Dr.
Ellice MacDonald, have been working for years on the theory that the development
of
cancer has a definite relationship to the pH of the blood plasma. Dr. Guy
goes one step further, holding that the lymph is the responsible factor,
and that,
in cancer patients, the hydrogen-ion concentration is much higher than
in normal individuals. It is necessary to give large doses of appropriate
acids
to these
patients to bring the acid-base balance to normal. When this is done, in
his experience, remarkable changes are seen in the new growths, some of
which seem
to disappear, and the lives of the patients are prolonged in comfort. He
carries his theory further by claiming that there seems to be little doubt
that the
water supply bears a distinct relation to frequency of occurrence of this
disease in certain areas or "cancer belts." He is studying this
problem at the present time.
It seems but reasonable to discuss at this point the theoretical weaknesses
in the claims of both Dr. Ferguson and Dr. Guy as to the efficacy of the
hydrochloric acid or acid-mineral therapy. First of all, are the remarkable
results that
have been reported actual facts or figments of the imagination of an enthusiast?
In the reports of Dr. Ferguson, we find a wealth of clinical observations,
made before and after treatment, to support his statement that intravenous
administration of solutions of hydrochloric acid will actually increase
the polynuclear leukocytes of the blood. Ferguson stops theorizing at this
point,
and, perhaps, that is wise. Whether or not this increase is due to change
in acid-base balance or to stimulation of hormone action is for someone
else to
determine. In our own studies clinically, we are forced to agree with him.
The records of our cases in the wards where this procedure has been given
a fair trial show conclusively that, in each case observed, there has been
definite
improvement as indicated by the blood-counts. Furthermore, the objection
raised as to the possible toxicity of this procedure has not been borne
out by the
experience. A patient, suffering from some obscure cerebral disturbance,
and in coma upon admission, lay unconscious for several days. Spinal drainage
showed
a pressure so high that, on several occasions, it could not be recorded.
The Wassermann was negative; the cell count was 225, sugar 2-plus, and
globulin 4-plus, culture-negative. There was choking of the discs, but
definite localizing
symptoms were difficult to determine because of the man's stuporous condition.
Soon after admission, even in the absence of a positive spinal Wassermann,
he was given 0.9 gm. neo-arsphenamin, followed by spinal drainage. This
seemed to improve his general condition temporarily, but he soon relapsed
into unconsciousness,
became incontinent, and developed Cheyne-Stokes breathing. The end seemed
imminent.
By chance, Dr. Burr Ferguson, who was on his way to the AMA convention,
was asked to see the patient. He agreed with the suggested diagnosis of
meningo-encephalitis,
with the possible development of cerebral abscess, but unhesitatingly advocated
heroic doses of hydrochloric acid intravenously. Acting upon his suggestion,
the man was given 20 cc of a 1-500 solution. There was no evidence of uptoward
reaction. Through a misunderstanding, the second dose of the same strength
was given two hours later, also with no ill effect. Injections of 1-500
solutions were continued every two days, but with little appreciable effect,
except
a marked increase in polynuclear leukocytosis. Several days later, the
patient showed slight improvement, but was developing bedsores and pustular
eruption
on his back and buttocks from the continual soiling. A local application
of
1-1000 HCl solution was immediately successful in bringing about rapid
healing of these sores. For a time, the man was able to converse intelligently,
was
able to take food, and, on one occasion, climbed over the sides of the
restraining crib to the floor and appeared in the ward walking normally.
His spinal pressure
still remained high --so high that it could not be recorded by the manometer – but
his temperature came down to 99.0º F; pulse 72, and the spinal cell-count
fell to 31. The man was later removed to the University Hospital and died
following an operation in which a large brain tumor was removed.
A second case in the wards was that of a young man, admitted in serious
condition with signs of pneumonia involving the left lung. He was treated
by the usual
methods and recovered from the more acute condition, but the involvement
of the left lung and pleura refused to clear up. X-ray examinations showed
evidence
of some fluid, or thickened pleura, on the left side, and the physical
signs over this area supported this diagnosis. His temperature began to
develop
the characteristic septic swing from normal or subnormal to 101.0º or 102.0º F,
with sweating and chills. An aspiration was attempted, but no fluid obtained.
He was given 1-1500 HCl injections intravenously, 10 cc, every second day.
Immediately, improvement was noted in his general condition, but in a day
or two he complained of considerable left-sided pleuritic pain and discomfort
in breathing. The X-ray showed some increase in the shadow over the left
base,
and the breath sounds became more indistinct. A second aspiration was successful,
and 40 cc of cloudy fluid obtained, which on examination showed pheumococci
and short-chain streptococci. The patient stated that he experienced immediate
relief from his pain. The following day he was much more comfortable, and
the temperature began to come steadily down to normal. He was given the
acid-mineral solution (formula of Guy), 12 drops every three hours, with
continuation
of
the intravenous therapy. His condition immediately became extremely satisfactory,
his temperature returned to normal, and he began eating ravenously. His
leukocyte count fell to approximately normal, as might be expected where
necessity
for phagocytic actively no longer existed. We mention this case to illustrate
the
point emphasized in the first part of this introduction, that collections
of pus may be expected in closed cavities when phagocytic activity is increased.
In this case, however, the mere withdrawal of a portion of the infected
fluid was sufficient to throw the balance in favor of the patient. A thoracotomy,
with weeks and months of drainage and discomfort (to say nothing of hospital
expense), seems to have been obviated by this simple therapeutic procedure.
In conclusion, we wish to say that we feel that the medical profession
is probably entering upon an era of remarkable discoveries, based upon
the logical theories
of Dr. Guy and Dr. Ferguson, who are at the present time suffering from
the stings of skepticism on the part of many of their colleagues. We realize
most
fully that many steps must be taken before the procedures advocated by
these pioneers can be accepted by the conservatives. Careful checking of
results
by laboratory investigation will eventually establish or disprove the assertions
made by these men. However, it seems incumbent upon progressive practitioners
to make every effort to assist in clinical research that may later prove
of unbounded assistance in the healing of the sick patient. We have been
led along
the paths of synthetic medication for too many years, to the detriment
of too many sufferers, as evidenced by the growing incidence of serious
blood disturbances,
such as agranulocytosis, methemoglobinemia, and others. We have often relieved
pain without attacking the underlying cause; we have operated when resistance
was at too low an ebb; we have prescribed remedies empirically, without
clear-cut knowledge of their action or collateral effect. Let us make a
determined effort
to follow our line of treatment with scientific exactness, and if we feel
justified in assisting the work of Ferguson, Guy, and others, we may either
offer conclusive
proof in condemnation of its principles or congratulate ourselves on being
able to support the efforts of its advocates by accurate clinical proofs
and painstaking case records.
Henry Pleasants, Jr.
Associate Editor, The Medical World
Page 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
|